\n## ⚡ Choosing Your LLM Serving Stack
The LLM inference landscape has matured significantly. Here’s an honest comparison of the three leading serving frameworks in 2026.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | vLLM | TGI | Ollama |
|---|
| Target | Production at scale | Production (HF ecosystem) | Development & edge |
| Performance | Highest throughput | High throughput | Moderate |
| PagedAttention | ✅ (invented it) | ✅ | ❌ |
| Continuous Batching | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Tensor Parallelism | ✅ (multi-GPU) | ✅ | Limited |
| Quantization | AWQ, GPTQ, FP8 | AWQ, GPTQ, EETQ | GGUF (llama.cpp) |
| API | OpenAI-compatible | Custom + OpenAI | OpenAI-compatible |
| Kubernetes | Excellent | Good | Basic |
| Ease of Setup | Medium | Medium | Very Easy |
Best for high-throughput production serving:
# Deploy with Docker
docker run --gpus all -p 8000:8000 \
vllm/vllm-openai:latest \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct \
--tensor-parallel-size 4 \
--max-model-len 8192 \
--enable-chunked-prefill \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.9
# Kubernetes deployment
helm install vllm vllm/vllm \
--set model=granite-34b-code-instruct \
--set tensorParallelism=2 \
--set resources.limits.nvidia\.com/gpu=2
Choose vLLM when: Maximum throughput matters, multi-GPU serving, OpenAI API compatibility needed.
TGI: The Hugging Face Native
Best for Hugging Face model ecosystem:
docker run --gpus all -p 8080:80 \
ghcr.io/huggingface/text-generation-inference:latest \
--model-id meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct \
--max-input-length 4096 \
--max-total-tokens 8192 \
--quantize awq
Choose TGI when: Using HF models, need built-in safety features (watermarking, content filtering), want HF ecosystem integration.
Ollama: The Developer’s Friend
Best for local development and edge deployment:
# Install and run — that's it
ollama run llama3.1:8b
# API usage
curl http://localhost:11434/api/generate -d '{
"model": "llama3.1:8b",
"prompt": "Write a Kubernetes deployment for nginx"
}'
Choose Ollama when: Local development, prototyping, edge deployment, teams without GPU infrastructure expertise.
Benchmark Results (A100 80GB)
Llama 3.1 8B, 512 input tokens, 256 output tokens:
| Framework | Throughput (req/s) | P50 Latency | P99 Latency |
|---|
| vLLM | 42.3 | 180ms | 890ms |
| TGI | 38.7 | 210ms | 950ms |
| Ollama | 12.1 | 520ms | 2100ms |
My Recommendation
Production serving (high scale) → vLLM
Production serving (HF models) → TGI
Development / testing → Ollama
Edge / single-GPU → Ollama or vLLM
Multi-GPU inference → vLLM
Most organizations end up running Ollama for dev and vLLM for production. That’s the right call.
Need help choosing and deploying an LLM serving stack? I help organizations build production AI infrastructure. Get in touch.\n